Much add-UI about nothing!
I’ve worked as a CAD trainer and consultant for over 17 years. During that time, I’ve seen numerous user interface changes for both AutoCAD and more recently Revit. In each case, critics have erroneously assumed that any radical screen revamp would ultimately alienate all users and sound the death knell of the product. Without exception, users adjust and the unfounded alarmism of these opponents is exposed as unjustified.
So it came as no surprise, when certain prominent and vocal members of the notorious Reviterati condemned the Ribbon as a pernicious addition to an hitherto perfect interface.
For the uninitiated, the Reviterati is that secret society (similar to the Illuminati in Dan Brown’s conspiracy theory novels) comprising veteran Revit users. By veteran, I mean over 10 or more years association from the early ‘iconoclastic’ period of this ‘insanely great’ (to quote early Steve Jobs) piece of software. Prior influence on early product development decisions doesn’t hurt either.
This conservative view of the UI betrays an underlying nostalgia that has no place in major industry. Yes, software development is a major global industry and alignment with the major players, such as Microsoft, is key to ensuring survival. Although it may be quaint to drive a DeLorean, watch your movies on a Sony Betamax and ask the grocer to re-quote prices in pounds, shilling and pence; this ethos hardly represents progress.
The unpleasant side of nostalgia is the fear of change. This is clearly seen when ‘old-school’ AutoCAD users prefer memorizing every single dimensioning variable, rather than just entering a value against the representative image in a dialog box. Or when contract draftsmen insist on installing their personalised keyboard shortcuts from a virus-riddled floppy disc that they’ve carried around for ten years. There’s nothing wrong with these preferences. Just don’t let them become an end in themselves and a badge of CAD literacy.
What do we know of future changes to the Windows OS that will make the Revit Design Bar and Options Bar unsuitable in Windows 7 or later? Yet, there are some who feel impelled to decry the new interface as a step in the wrong direction. Since when was gaining additional drawing space a bad idea? Since when did a more task-oriented and context-sensitive screen become a hindrance to new users?
And now to cap it all off, the breakaway 2009 UI movement are happy to show us how to violate our Autodesk support agreement by running Revit 2010 in 2009 debug mode. Imagine the problems generated by a software crash in this state. You dutifully post a support request on the Autodesk Subscription Centre with a capture of your screen and journal file only to find the whole matter rejected as an unsupported customisation.
So here’s the deal, if you want progress, adapt to the new interface. You may even like it. Alternatively, under the Autodesk Previous Use Policy, running Revit 2009 is perfectly acceptable for subscription customers. But whatever you do, don’t bow to the wishes of the Reviterati by running 2010 in 2009 mode.


